The Correlation of Digital Competence and Crisis Management

Evidence from the Polish Public Administration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.123

Keywords:

crisis management, digital competence, digital tools, public administration, data security

Abstract

In the age of digitalization, when almost all aspects of social activity are effected and novel threats to a rapidly changing environment are being posed, the ability of public servants to use digital tools competently is crucial for an effective crisis management. This article examines the two-dimensional importance of digital competence, which includes both an ability to operate modern technologies and an awareness of potential cyber threats. The study draws on a literature analysis coupled with qualitative and behavioral methods to explore how digital competence affects the effectiveness of crisis management. The results indicate that it is not only technical proficiency that is important but ongoing cyber security training too is of crucial importance. These two combined form the basis for effective prediction, monitoring and response to crises. The article highlights the need to integrate digital competence as a fundamental element of crisis management strategies in public administrations while suggesting directions for further research in this area.

Author Biographies

  • Krzysztof Kaczmarek, Koszalin University of Technology in Koszalin

    Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Koszalin University of Technology in Koszalin, Koszalin, Poland.

  • Mirosław Karpiuk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

    Full Professor, Chair of Administrative Law and Security Studies, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.

  • Jarosław Kostrubiec, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University

    University Professor and Dean, Institute of Legal Sciences, Faculty of Law and Administration, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.

References

Budai, B. B., Csuhai, S., & Tózsa, I. (2023). Digital Competence Development in Public Administration Higher Education. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12462. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612462

Catakli, D. (2022). Verwaltung im digitalen Zeitalter: Die Rolle digitaler Kompetenzen in der Personalakquise des höheren Dienstes. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38958-1

Ćwik B. (2017). Postrzeganie zagrożeń w systemach bezpieczeństwa organizacji. Modern Management Review, 24(3), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2017.mmr.24

Czuryk, M. (2022). Restrictions on the Exercising of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms Due to Cybersecurity Issues. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 31(3), 31–43, https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.3.31-43.

Czuryk, M., Dunaj, K., Karpiuk, M., & Prokop, K. (2016). Prawo zarządzania kryzysowego. Zarys systemu. UWM.

European Commission. (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2766/569540

European Commission. (2023). Report on the State of the Digital Decade 2023: Annex – All Member States. Publications Office of the European Union. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/98669

Guo, H., Yang, Z., Huang, R., & Li, X. (2020). The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: Implications from a COVID-19 survey. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-020-00087-1

Hoffman, I., & Kostrubiec, J. (2022). Political Freedoms and Rights in Relation to the Covid-19 Pandemic in Poland and Hungary in a Comparative Legal Perspective. Bialystok Legal Studies, 27(2), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2022.27.02.02

Hulkó, G. (2021). Fake news és social media: szabályozás és közigazgatási intézkedések Szlovákiában [Fake news and social media: regulation and administrative measures in Slovakia]. In Medias Res, 10(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.10.2.7

Kaczmarek, K. (2023). Dezinformacja jako czynnik ryzyka w sytuacjach kryzysowych [Disinformation as a Risk Factor in Crisis Situations]. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych, 51(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.18290/rns2023.0017

Karpiuk, M. (2020). The obligations of public entities within the national cybersecurity system. Cybersecurity and Law, 4(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.35467/cal/133971

Karpiuk, M. (2021). Cybersecurity as an element in the planning activities of public administration. Cybersecurity and Law, 5(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.35467/cal/142179

Karpiuk, M. (2022). Crisis management vs. cyber threat. Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società, 16(2), 113–123. Online: https://shorturl.at/9vcEw

Karpiuk, M., Pizło, W., & Kaczmarek, K. (2023). Cybersecurity Management – Current State and Directions of Change. International Journal of Legal Studies, 14(2), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.2880

Kostrubiec, J. (2021). Sztuczna inteligencja a prawa i wolności człowieka. Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości. Online: https://shorturl.at/HDYbc

Leonard, H. B., Howitt, A. M., & Giles, D. W. (2020). Crisis Management for Leaders Coping with COVID-19. Program on Crisis Leadership, Harvard Kennedy School. Online: https://shorturl.at/0Qpic

Lopes, A. S., Sargento, A., & Farto, J. (2023). Training in digital skills—The perspective of workers in public sector. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10577. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310577

Łukaszuk, A. (2022). Problematyka kompetencji cyfrowych kadr administracji publicznej jako istotnego czynnika procesu transformacji cyfrowej jednostek samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, 58, 287–313. https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.7985

OECD. (2021). Public Employment and Management 2021: The Future of the Public Service. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/938f0d65-en

Okpala, I., Halse, S., & Kropczynski, J. (2023). Machine Learning Methods for Evaluating Public Crisis: Meta-Analysis. 9th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI'2022), Las Vegas, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.02267

Olech, A. (2020). Fazy zarządzania kryzysowego w kontekście zagrożeń terrorystycznych. In K. Śmiałek (Ed.), Zarządzanie kryzysowe wobec wyzwań i zagrożeń dla bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego państwa (pp. 95–109). Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna.

Phillips, T. (2021). The Great Québec Blackout. Online: https://spaceweatherarchive.com/2021/03/12/the-great-quebec-blackout/

Qadir, J., Ali, A., ur Rasool, R., Zwitter, A., Sathiaseelan, A., & Crowcroft, J. (2016). Crisis analytics: big data-driven crisis response. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 1(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-016-0013-9

Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., & Van Kleek, M. (2020). Digitalization of COVID-19 Pandemic Management and Cyber Risk from Connected Systems. IEEE Internet of Things. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.12409

Szczurek, T. (2023). Resort obrony narodowej w systemie zarządzania kryzysowego [Ministry of National Defense in the Crisis Management System]. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych, 51(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.18290/rns2023.0020

Van der Wal, Z. (2020). Being a Public Manager in Times of Crisis: The Art of Managing Stakeholders, Political Masters, and Collaborative Networks. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 759–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13245

Verhoest, K., Hammerschmid, G., Rykka, L. H., & Klijn, E. H. (2024). Collaborating for Digital Transformation. How Internal and External Collaboration Can Contribute to Innovate Public Service Delivery. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923895

Włodyka E. M. (2024). Polaryzacja, kohabitacja czy integracja? Wyzwania cyberbezpieczeństwa procesów wyborczych w Polsce. In M. Karpiuk (Ed.), Cyberbezpieczeństwo. Aspekty krajowe i międzynarodowe (pp. 104–123). Wydawnictwo Akademii Sztuki Wojennej.

Włodyka, E. M. (2022). Konsolidować, nie konsolidować… głos do dyskusji o połączeniu korpusu służby cywilnej i pracowników samorządowych. Studia Iuridica, 92, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-92.11

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

The Correlation of Digital Competence and Crisis Management: Evidence from the Polish Public Administration. (2025). Institutiones Administrationis - Journal of Administrative Sciences, 5(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.123