Establishing a System for Verifying Matriculation Exam in Polish Administrative Law: Selected Aspects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.156

Keywords:

secondary school leaving exam, matriculation exam, external examination, higher education admission, control of examinations

Abstract

The secondary school leaving exam exists under various names and with varying characteristics across the globe. The Polish matriculation exam (“matura”) deserves special attention as it has assumed a new, external aspect since its overall reform in 2005. Unfortunately, the first years after the reform revealed a significant problem with its assessment: numerous cases of incorrectly graded papers have been reported which fueled large-scale social unrest as there was no procedure in place for appealing against the matura results. After more than ten years, the regulations were changed for the better, and a special body, the College of Examination Arbitration was installed. In this paper, I consider this historic development, and I offer a general treatment of its administrative and constitutional implications as to the educational rights and civic liberties within the Polish legal context.

Author Biography

  • Łukasz Kierznowski, University of Bialystok

    Associate Professor, Department of Administrative Law and Administrative Procedure, Faculty of Law, University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland

References

Bąkowski, T., & Kornberger-Sokołowska, E. (2017). Opinia z 27.4.2016 r. o projekcie ustawy o zmianie ustawy o systemie oświaty oraz niektórych innych ustaw (RL-0303-11/16). Przegląd Legislacyjny, 2, 154–158. Online: https://tinyurl.com/5ar387u7

Flisek, K. (2017). Odwołanie od wyniku egzaminu maturalnego. Roczniki Administracji i Prawa, 17, 201–207.

Gut, D. (2024). Model of Adjudicatory Powers of Polish Administrative Courts. Contemporary Central & East European Law, 1(135), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37232/cceel.2024.02

Jackowski, M. (2017). Judicial Review of Public Power in Poland. In Arnold, R., Martínez-Estay, J. (Eds.), Rule of Law, Human Rights and Judicial Control of Power. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice 61 (pp. 53–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_3

Jakubowski, A. (2011). Glosa do postanowienia WSA z dnia 28 lipca 2006 r. (I SA/Wa 2027/05). Przegląd Prawa Publicznego, 6, 62–70.

Jakubowski, A. (2014). Konsekwencje zasad państwa prawnego dla prawotwórstwa w sferze edukacji. Przegląd Sejmowy, 5(124), 202–218.

Jakubowski, M. (2015). Opening up opportunities: education reforms in Poland. IBS Policy Paper, 1. Online: https://shorturl.at/2B0P7

Jakubowski, M., Patrinos, H. A., Porta, E. E., & Wiśniewski, J. (2010). The impact of the 1999 education reform in Poland (English). Policy Research working paper, WPS5263. Online: https://shorturl.at/lZ8or

Jakubowski, M., Patrinos, H. A., Porta, E. E., & Wiśniewski, J. (2016). The effects of delaying tracking in secondary school: evidence from the 1999 education reform in Poland. Education Economics, 24(6), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2016.1149548

Kellaghan, T., & Greaney, V. (2020). Public Examinations Examined. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1418-1

Kellaghan, T., & Madaus, G. (2003). External (Public) Examinations. In T. Kellaghan, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Springer International Handbooks of Education 9 (pp. 577–600). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_34

Kierznowski, Ł. (2016). Egzamin maturalny w Polsce. Analiza prawna. Wydawnictwo Prawo i Partnerstwo. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5218

Kierznowski, Ł. (2023a). Prawne przyczyny nieprawidłowego oceniania egzaminów maturalnych. Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. Online: https://shorturl.at/iceqK

Kierznowski, Ł. (2023b). Status prawny i tryb działania Kolegium Arbitrażu Egzaminacyjnego. Przegląd Prawa Publicznego, 6, 41–52. Online: https://shorturl.at/xOr4B

Kierznowski, Ł. (2023c). The effects of an incorrect assessment of a matriculation exam on college admission procedures in Poland. Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 33(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2023.025

Króliczek, P. (2016). Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 22 czerwca 2015 r., sygn. SK 29/13. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, 3(31), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2016.03.18

Kwiek, M. (2013). From System Expansion to System Contraction: Access to Higher Education in Poland. Comparative Education Review, 3(57), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1086/670662

Najwyższa Izba Kontroli (NIK). (2015). Informacja o wynikach kontroli. System egzaminów zewnętrznych w oświacie [Information on the results of the inspection. External exams in the education system] (Report No. K-4101-002-00/2014).

Pilich, M. (2015). Ustawa o systemie oświaty. Komentarz. Wolters Kluwer

Radó P., Munkácsy B., Scharle Á., & Kende Á. (2021). Adapting to Future Challenges to Education. Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia. CEU Center for Policy Studies. Online: https://shorturl.at/1hmWm

Skoczylas A., & Swora M. (2007). Administrative Judiciary in Poland in Search for Fairness and Efficiency – an Overview. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 3(19), 116–125. Online: https://shorturl.at/f8lEi

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

Establishing a System for Verifying Matriculation Exam in Polish Administrative Law: Selected Aspects. (2025). Institutiones Administrationis - Journal of Administrative Sciences, 5(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.156