Implications of digitalization during the COVID-19 pandemics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i1.30

Keywords:

Mobile Tracing Application, Digital Green Certificate, European Digital Identity, GDPR, health data, Covid-19

Abstract

The article provides with analysis of the proposal of Regulation on European Digital Identity with regards to processing of personal data, particularly those that concerns health. It presents cross-examination with the Mobile Tracing Application and Digital Green Certificate which were established in order to combat the COVID-19. Lastly, it mentions the main challenges and critical positions, as well as proposals on how to tackle some of them.

References

Bassot, É., & Wolfgang, H. (2018). The Juncker Commission’s ten priorities. State of play in autumn 2018. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://doi.org/10.2861/50748

European Commission. (2020). eHealth Network Guidelines to the EU Member States and the European Commission on Interoperability specifications for cross-border transmission chains between approved apps. Basic interoperability elements between COVID+ Keys driven solutions. Online: https://bit.ly/3N0B8nd

European Commission. (2022). Mobile contact tracing apps in EU Member States. Online: https://bit.ly/3N3SAHs

European Data Protection Board (2021a). EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 04/2021 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable certificates on vaccination, testing and recovery to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic (Digital Green Certificate). Online: https://bit.ly/3xrf1AI

European Data Protection Board (2021b). Formal comments of the EDPS on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity. Online: https://bit.ly/39wAJv7

European Data Protection Board. (2020). Guidelines 04/2020 on the use of location data and contact tracing tools in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. Online: https://bit.ly/3mTLlY4

European Data Protection Supervisor. (2021). Government access to data in third countries, Final Report, EDPS/2019/02-13. Online: https://bit.ly/3xBqCxd

European Parliament. (2020, May 14). COVID-19 tracing apps: MEPs stress the need to preserve citizensʼ privacy. Online: https://bit.ly/3xBqNsn

Gawronski, M. (Ed.) (2019). Guide to the GDPR. Wolters Kluwer.

Krysztofek, M. (2021). GDPR: personal data protection in the European Union. Wolters Kluwer.

Tzanou, M. (Ed.) (2020). Health Data Privacy under the GDPR: Big Data Challenges and Regulatory responses. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022241

Varga, B. M. (2020, April 23). The differences between SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://bit.ly/3zNlBEn

Legal sources

Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data, OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1–22. Online: https://bit.ly/3xC7fnt

Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 73–114. Online: https://bit.ly/3tCZQDm

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity, COM/2021/281 final

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity (COM(2021) 281 final – 2021/0136 (COD)), EESC 2021/02756, OJ C 105, 4.3.2022, p. 81–86. Online: https://bit.ly/3mYpIWK

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88. Online: https://bit.ly/3tGK3DG

Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (Text with EEA relevance), PE/31/2018/REV/1, OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39–98. Online: https://bit.ly/3HylsGJ

Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2021 on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 211, 15.6.2021, p. 1–22. Online: https://bit.ly/3tGAHYv

Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare, OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45-65. Online: https://bit.ly/3tE8ZvC

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2020/518 of 8 April 2020 on a common Union toolbox for the use of technology and data to combat and exit from the COVID-19 crisis, in particular concerning mobile applications and the use of anonymised mobility data, OJ L 114, 14.4.2020, p. 7–15. Online: https://bit.ly/39zWM4a

Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475 of 13 October 2020 on a coordinated approach to the restriction of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 337, 14.10.2020, p. 3–9. Online: https://bit.ly/3y0e3gr

Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 2119/98/EC (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 293, 5.11.2013, p. 1–15. Online: https://bit.ly/3zZPxNV

Commission Implementing Decision 2019/1765 of 22 October 2019 providing the rules for the establishment, the management and the functioning of the network of national authorities responsible for eHealth, and repealing Implementing Decision 2011/890/EU (notified under document C(2019) 7460) (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 270, 24.10.2019, p. 83–93. Online: https://bit.ly/3N3SSOy

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1023 of 15 July 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1765 as regards the cross-border exchange of data between national contact tracing and warning mobile applications with regard to combatting the COVID-19 pandemic (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 227I, 16.7.2020, p. 1–9. Online: https://bit.ly/3zZPnWP

Case of Vavřička and others v. the Czech Republic, Applications nos. 47621/13 and 5 others. Online: https://bit.ly/39xErVe

Judgement of 16 July 2020, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems, C-311/18, EU:C:2020:559.

The European Commission´s priorities for 2019-2024. Online: https://bit.ly/39uyOqU

Downloads

Published

2022-07-22

How to Cite

Implications of digitalization during the COVID-19 pandemics. (2022). Institutiones Administrationis - Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i1.30