Digitalization and consumer protection enforcement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i1.42

Keywords:

digital platform, consumer protection, Hungarian Competition Authority, Consumer Protection Cooperation Network

Abstract

The era of “new consumer protection” is marked by maximum harmonization rather minimum harmonization, (more) policy-based approach, legislation driven by the fast-emerging ecosystem of digital platforms, the strengthening of collective remedy and agency enforcement, and more cooperation between Member State regulatory bodies and EU Commission.

All of the above phenomenae emphasize changing directions and methods of consumer protection enforcement: digital platforms present a unique set of issues that trigger different policy solutions, mostly based on the findings of behavioral economics. The practices of digital platforms usually affect consumers in more than one Member State, thus EU-wide cooperation is more likely to happen vis-à-vis digital platforms than other traders. Individual remedies against digital platforms – due to their immense size – result in little change. The European Consumer Protection Cooperation Network is highly likely to open cases with regards to digital platforms.

In Hungarian law, EU-wide coordination complements an already existing rich practice of the Hungarian Competition Authority in the field of unfair commercial practices. In the future, where quite possibly, the number of cases against digital platforms will grow, the issue of cooperation will grow even more important.

References

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Alemanno, A. (2019). Nudge and the European Union. In Straßheim, H., & Beck, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Behavioural Change and Public Policy (pp. 138–147). Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367854.00016

Bator, F. M. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882231

BEUC. (2021, February 16). BEUC files complaint against TikTok for multiple EU consumer law breaches. Online: https://bit.ly/3P9FYQu

DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315

European Commission, Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency, Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Gaskell, G., Tornese, P., Vila, J., Gómez, Y., Allen, A., Veltri, G., & Codagnone, C. (2018). Behavioural study on the transparency of online platforms. Final report. https://doi.org/10.2818/637090

European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers, Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Boluda, A., Bogliacino, F., Liva, G., Lechardoy, L., & Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell, T. (2022a). Behavioural study on unfair commercial practices in the digital environment: dark patterns and manipulative personalisation. Final report. https://doi.org/10.2838/859030

European Commission. (2020a). Booking.com enforcement action. Commitments obtained by the European Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) authorities. Online: https://bit.ly/3uvZiQ9

European Commission. (2020b). New Consumer Agenda: European Commission to empower consumers to become the driver of transition. Online: https://bit.ly/3uuX839

European Commission. (2022b). Commission Staff Working Document. Biennial overview of actions carried out by national authorities under Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 on consumer protection cooperation and key market trends that might affect consumers' interests in the future. SWD(2022) 108 final.

European Data Protection Board. (2022). Guidelines 3/2022 on Dark patterns in social media platform interfaces: How to recognise and avoid them. Online: https://bit.ly/3yMusFv

Federal Trade Commission. (2021). Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Negative Option Marketing. Online: https://bit.ly/3bUA2g5

Hungarian Competition Authority. (2021). Summary of the Activities of the Hungarian Competition Authority in 2020. Online: https://bit.ly/3OSfh3a

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392

Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. Penguin Books.

Muris, T. J. (2002). The Interface of Competition and Consumer Protection. Online: https://bit.ly/3OHJjXj

OECD. (2010). Consumer Policy Toolkit (Summary). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264079663-sum-en

OECD. (2007). Report on Second Roundtable on Economics for Consumer Policy. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 132, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/230744208356

Šajn, N. (2020). Enforcement of consumer protection legislation [Briefing]. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://bit.ly/3yelQ8Y

Legal sources

The Rome Treaty.

The Treaty of Maastricht.

The Treaty of Lisbon.

The Treaty of the European Union.

The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 364, 9.12.2004, p. 1–11.

Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 OJ L 345, 27.12.2017, p. 1–26.

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, p. 29–34.

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’), OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 22–39.

Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64–88.

Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast) OJ L 321, 17.12.2018, p. 36–214.

Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services (Text with EEA relevance.) OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 1–27.

Directive (EU) 2019/2161 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directives 98/6/EC, 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the better enforcement and modernisation of Union consumer protection rules (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L 328, 18.12.2019, p. 7–28.

Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2020 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers and repealing Directive 2009/22/EC (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L 409, 4.12.2020, p. 1–27.

Commission Decision of 27.6.2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (AT.39740 - Google Search (Shopping)) C(2017) 4444 final. Online: https://bit.ly/3OMHf01

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A European Consumer Agenda - Boosting confidence and growth (COM/2012/0225 final). Online: https://bit.ly/3ahMeam

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, A New Deal for Consumers (COM/2018/0183 final).

Commission Notice – Guidance on the interpretation and application of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (Text with EEA relevance), OJ C 526, 29.12.2021, p. 1–129.

Act LVII of 1996 on the Prohibition of Unfair Trading Practices and Unfair Competition.

Act CLV of 1997 on Consumer Protection.

Act XLVII of 2008 on the Prohibition of Unfair Commercial Practices.

Governmental decree 387/2016. (XII. 2.) on the designation of the consumer protection authority.

HCA Resolution Vj-17/2018.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-22

How to Cite

Digitalization and consumer protection enforcement. (2022). Institutiones Administrationis - Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i1.42