The Russian Invasion of Ukraine and the Czech Supreme Administrative Court

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v3i1.63

Keywords:

Russia-Ukrainian conflict, Czech Supreme Administrative Court, non-refoulement, safe country of origin, temporary protection

Abstract

The presented paper is devoted to the Czech Supreme Administrative Court's approach to the Russian invasion of Ukraine from the perspective of deciding asylum issues. Specifically, the author focuses on the principle of non-refoulement and breaking the standard rules of administrative court proceedings and Ukraine as a safe country of origin. Finally, the author describes a relatively recent Czech Supreme Administrative Court's ruling in which it addressed the issue of including temporary protection within the international protection system.

Author Biography

  • Šimon Otta, Palacký University in Olomouc

    PhD student, Department of Administrative Law and Financial Law, Faculty of Law, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic

References

AEDH, EuroMed Rights, FIDH. (2016). “Safe” countries: A denial of the right of asylum. Online: https://bit.ly/43xYkm1

Boeles, P., den Heijer, M., Lodder, G., & Wouters, K. (2014). European Migration Law. Intersentia.

European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE). (2015). “Safe countries of origin”: A safe concept?. AIDA Legal Briefing, 3. Online: https://bit.ly/43vY1bt

European Commission. (2015). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an EU common list of safe countries of origin for the purposes of the Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, and amending Directive 2013/32/EU. COM(2015) 452 final.

European Commission. (2019). Withdrawal of Commission proposals. OJ C 210, 21.6.2019, p. 13–14.

Furramani, E., & Bushati, R. (2022). The Principle of “Non-Refoulement” and its Evolution in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(3), 107– 120. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0071

Goodwin-Gill, G. S., & McAdam, J. (2007). The Refugee in International Law (3rd ed.). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199207633.001.0001

Haraszti Gy. (1960). The Right os Asylum. Acta Juridica, 2(3–4), 359–385. Online: http://real-j.mtak.hu/796/1/ACTAJURIDICA_02.pdf

Hunt, M. (2014). The Safe Country of Origin Concept in European Asylum Law: Past, Present and Future. International Journal of Refugee Law, 26(4), 500–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeu052

Ineli-Ciger, M., & Skordas, A. (2019). Temporary Protection. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Online: https://bit.ly/3X3rVkY

Orav, A. (2021). Common procedure for asylum. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://bit.ly/3qEa3Rz

Orav, A., Apap, J. (2017). Safe countries of origin: Proposed common EU list. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://bit.ly/3MZMVEj

Weis, P. (1967). The 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees and Some Questions of the Law of Treaties.British Yearbook of International Law, London: H. Frowde, 42 (pp. 39 – 70).

Wouters, C. W. (2009). International legal standards for the protection from refoulement: A legal analysis of the prohibitions on refoulement contained in the Refugee Convention, the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention against Torture. Intersentia. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13756

Downloads

Published

2024-03-22

How to Cite

The Russian Invasion of Ukraine and the Czech Supreme Administrative Court. (2024). Institutiones Administrationis - Journal of Administrative Sciences, 3(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v3i1.63