Emergence of Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence in the Intellectual Property System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v3i2.88

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, intellectual property, industrial property, copyright

Abstract

This paper was set to address to what extent intellectual property law is prepared for keeping pace with the rapid development of artificial intelligence and digitalization? We examined, by way of using empirical methods, the relationship between artificial intelligence, its regulation and the current trends in intellectual works. The overall conclusion of our research findings demonstrates that current legislation is well suited to support the requirements of technological progress. Nevertheless, there are some new dimensions in terms of worthy proposals that may also be considered. This paper stresses that given AI is capable of bringing significant transformations in our daily lives about, a major paradigm shift in legislation may soon be inevitably required.

Author Biographies

  • Gábor Szilágyi, University of Debrecen

    PhD student, Marton Géza Doctoral School, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

  • Judit Gyarmathy, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary

    PhD student, Law and Political Sciences Doctoral School, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Budapest, Hungary

References

Bond, T., & Cox, A. (2021). Copyright and AI: Creation Without a Creator. In P. Sherrell (Ed.), International Comparative Legal Guides. Copyright 2022 (8th ed.). Practical cross-border insights into copyright law. Global Legal Group. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3schyvrz

European Commission. (2018a). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2018 Country Report Hungary. Online: https://tinyurl.com/yv44t9bm

European Commission. (2018b). Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence. COM(2018) 795 final. Online: https://tinyurl.com/hvvjt2tf

Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2018). Trends and priority shifts in artificial intelligence technology invention: A global patent analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 58, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.12.006

Grad-Gyenge A. (2022. February 22). Szerzői jog és internet - a szerzői jog aktuális kihívásai BME Public Lecture.

Grad-Gyenge A. (2023). A mesterséges intelligencia által generált tartalmak értelmezésének lehetőségei a szerzői jog útján. MTA Law Working Papers, 2. Online: https://tinyurl.com/2p9vzwhj

HVG. (2021, August 2). Bejegyezték a Dabus nevű mesterséges intelligencia nevére annak a találmánynak a szabadalmi jogát, amit a gép alkotott meg. A döntés új távlatokat nyithat a szabadalmi jogok bejegyzésében [The patent for the invention created by the machine has been registered in the name of the artificial intelligence Dabus. The decision could open up new horizons in patent registration]. Online: https://tinyurl.com/2s3ehk5m

Keserű, B. (2019). A mesterséges intelligencia néhány magánjogi aspektusáról. In J. Glavanits (Szerk.), A gazdasági jogalkotás aktuális kérdései (pp. 109–124). Dialóg Campus. Online: https://tinyurl.com/maj4msya

Keserű B. A. (2020). A mesterséges intelligencia magánjogi mibenlétéről. In Lévayné Fazekas J. (Szerk.), Az autonóm jűrművek és intelligens rendszerek jogi vonatkozásai (pp. 199–220). Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Kft. Online: https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31931776

Legeza D. (Ed.). (2017). Szerzői jog mindenkinek. Szellemi Tulajdon Nemzeti Hivatala. Online: https://tinyurl.com/34ftc3cf

Lontai E., Faludi G., Gyertyánfy P., & Vékás G. (2004). Magyar Polgári jog. Szellemi Alkotások Joga. Eötvös József Könyvkiadó.

Maggiore, M. (2018.). Artificial intelligence, computer generated works and copyright. In E. Bonadio, & N. Lucchi (Eds.), Non-conventional copyright. Do new and atypical works deserve protection? (pp. 382–399). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434074.00028

Mezei P. (2020). From Leonardo to the Next Rembrandt – The Need for AI-Pessimism in the Age of Algorithms. UFITA, 84(2), 390–429. https://doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390

Mezei P. (2021a, November 11). Mesterséges intelligencia és szerző jog [online presentation]. Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Legal Studies.

Mezei P. (2021b). “You AIn’t Seen Nothing yet” – Arguments against the Protectability of AI-generated Outputs by Copyright Law. MTA Law Working Papers, 16. Online: https://tinyurl.com/4e927e4m

Mittal, N., Saif, I., & Ammanath, B. (2022, October). Fueling the AI transformation: Four key actions powering widespread value from AI, right now. Deloitte. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3nfamwwn

Nótári T. (2010). A magyar szerzői jog fejlődése. Lectum.

Origo. (2022, August 8). Nincsenek jogai a kreatív mesterséges intelligenciának [Creative artificial intelligence has no rights]. Online: https://tinyurl.com/mryzwex4

Papdi-Pécskői V. (2021, September 23). Lehet-e feltaláló a mesterséges intelligencia? [Can artificial intelligence be an inventor?]. Index. Online: https://tinyurl.com/5n6kksjj

Papp L. (2015). A szabadalmi jogvédelem történeti perspektívái. Gondolat.

Pogácsás A., & Ujhelyi, D. (2022). Szellemi alkotások joga. Pázmány Press. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3562ktst

Stefán I. (2020.). A mesterséges intelligencia fogalmának polgári jogi értelmezése. Pro Futuro, 10(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.26521/profuturo/2020/1/7551

Szarka E. (1996). Iparjogvédelem Magyarországon – 100 éves a Magyar Szabadalmi Hivatal. Magyar Tudomány, 101(4), 207–227.

Tattay L. (2001). A szellemi alkotások joga. Szent István Társulat.

Trapova, A., & Mezei, P. (2022). Robojournalism – A Copyright Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the European News Industry. GRUR International, 589–602. Online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4032020

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lix.236.433

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Emergence of Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence in the Intellectual Property System. (2023). Institutiones Administrationis - Journal of Administrative Sciences, 3(2), 122-141. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v3i2.88